“Point-Line-Area” Methodology of Shale Oil Exploration and Development

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2020.02.001

Abstract

Abstract: China is rich in continental facies shale oil resources, but the grade of resources is relatively poor as a whole. Exploration and development are left behind in this area. Technological innovation is an important way for shale oil development on a large scale and with efficiency. It is of vital importance to enhance execution and management of technological projects while the “point-line-area” methodology is used in innovation. It is necessary to select the appropriate “point,” clarify what holds the key to technological problems, find the main contradiction and the main aspects of the contradiction, and make full use of the limited resources. It is necessary to control the “line,” complete and perfect the control lines of programs for various items of main work, ensure connection of one stage with another, and keep from being fragmented in the work. The “area” should be expanded in the efforts to formulate the reasonable schemes for promotion and application, strengthen the efforts for technological integration and wider application, and accelerate transformation and industrialization of achievements. It is necessary to follow the process of cognition from research to practice and from “point” to “line” and then “area.” The efforts should be focused on basic research and settlement of the key technological bottlenecks and construction of the exploration, development and engineering integration platform with the information real-time updated and shared. Basic research and settlement of technological bottlenecks should be brought under programmed supervision, management and adjustment. It is necessary to establish the full life cycle organizational management pattern and step up the top-level design to guide construction of the shale oil demonstration zone, thus accelerating China’s shale oil industrial development.

Key words: shale oil, exploration and development,&ldquo, point-line-area&rdquo, methodology, geological engineering integration

摘要： 我国陆相页岩油资源丰富, 但资源品质总体较差，勘探开发相对滞后，为实现页岩油规模效益开发，科技创新是重要路径，强化科技项目的执行管理是重中之重，并创新运用“点—线—面” 方法。优选“点”，理清科学问题关键，发现主要矛盾和矛盾的主要方面，充分利用有限资源；把控 “线”，建立和完善各项主要工作的程序控制线，确保各阶段顺利衔接，避免各自为政；拓宽“面”，制定合理的推广应用策略，加大技术集成与推广应用力度，加速成果转化与产业化。遵循由研究到实践、由“点”到“线”再到“面”的认识过程，从加强基础研究与核心技术攻关入手，建立信息实时更新与共享的勘探开发工程一体化平台，对基础研究与技术攻关进行程序化监管和调控，建立全生命周期组织管理模式，加强顶层设计引领页岩油示范区建设，以此推动我国页岩油产业快速发展。

关键词: 页岩油；勘探开发；&ldquo, 点&mdash, 线&mdash, 面&rdquo, 方法；地质工程一体化

CLC Number:

Liu He, Li Guoxin, Yao Zixiu, Jin Xu, Meng Siwei, Su Jian. “Point-Line-Area” Methodology of Shale Oil Exploration and Development[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2020, 39(2): 1-5.

刘合　李国欣　姚子修　金旭　孟思炜　苏健. 页岩油勘探开发“点—线—面”方法论[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2020, 39(2): 1-5.

References

[1] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1): 1-10. Zhao Wenzhi, Hu Suyun, Hou Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
[2] 支东明, 宋永, 何文军, 等. 准噶尔盆地中—下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(4):389-401. Zhi Dongming, Song Yong, He Wenjun, et al. Geological characteristics, resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in middle-lower Permian, Junggar Basin[J]. XinJiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 389-401.
[3] 柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2018,45(5):828-838. Liu Bo, Shi Jiaxin, Fu Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine finegrained sedimentary system: A case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838.
[4] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 赵敏, 等. 陆相页岩油工业化开发突破与实践：以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):589-600. Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Zhao Min, et al. Breakthrough and practice of industrial development on continental shale oil: a case study on Kong-2 Member in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 589-600.
[5] 付金华, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7 段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):601-614. Fu Jinhua, Niu Xiaobing, Dan Weidong, et al. The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang7 Member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 601-614.
[6] 包书景, 李世臻, 徐兴友, 等. 全国油气资源战略选区调查工程进展与成果[J]. 中国地质调查,2019,6(2):1-17. Bao Shujing, Li Shizhen, Xu Xingyou, et al. Progresses and achievements of the National Oil and Gas Resource Strategic Constituency Survey Project[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2019, 6(2): 1-17.
[7] 黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1): 17-32. Li Maowen, Ma Xiaoxiao, Jiang Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1):17-32.
[8] 刘文卿, 汤达祯, 潘伟义, 等. 北美典型页岩油地质特征对比及分类[J]. 科技通报,2016,32(11):13-18. Liu Wenqing, Tang Dazhen, Pan Weiyi, et al. Comparison of geological characteristics and types of typical shale oil in North America[J]. Bulletin Science and Technology, 2016, 32(11): 13-18.
[9]Fulford D S. Unconventional risk and uncertainty: Show me what success looks like[C]. SPE 179996, 2016.
[10]Mabadeje A O, Moghanloo R G. Uncertainty analysis of production forecast in Permian Basin[C]. SPE 195231, 2019.
[11]Steward, Dan B. George P. Mitchell and the Barnett Shale[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2013, 65(11):58-68.
[12] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报,2020,41(1):1-12． Zou Caineng, Pan Songqi, Jing Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[13] 邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017,28(12): 1781-1796. Zou Caineng, Zhao Qun, Dong Dazhong, et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796.
[14]Browning J, Ikonnikova S, Gülen G, et al. Barnett Shale production outlook[C]. SPE 165585, 2013.
[15]Abou-sayed I S, Sorrell M A, Foster R A, et al. Haynesville Shale development program - From vertical to horizontal[C]. SPE 144425, 2011.
[16] 周庆凡, 金之钧, 杨国丰, 等. 美国页岩油勘探开发现状与前景展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):469-477. Zhou Qingfan, Jin Zhijun, Yang Guofeng, et al. Shale oil exploration and production in the U.S.: Status and outlook [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 469-477.
[17] 杨雷, 金之钧. 全球页岩油发展及展望[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):553-559. Yang Lei, Jin Zhijun. Global shale oil development and prospects[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 553-559.
[18]Jaripatke O A, Barman I, Ndungu J G, et al. Review of Permian completion designs and results[C]. SPE 191560, 2018.
[19] 胡文瑞. 地质工程一体化是实现复杂油气藏效益勘探开发的必由之路[J]. 中国石油勘探,2017,22(1):1-5. Hu Wenrui. Geology-engineering integration – a necessary way to realize profitable exploration and development of complex reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1): 1-5.
[20] 吴宝成, 李建民, 邬元月, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油上甜点地质工程一体化开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):679-690. Wu Baocheng, Li Jianmin, Wu Yuanyue, et al. Development practices of geology-engineering integration on upper sweet spots of Lucaogou Formation shale oil in Jimsar sag, Junggar Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019, 24(5): 679-690.
[21] 霍进, 何吉祥, 高阳, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油开发难点及对策[J]. 新疆石油地质,2019,40(4):379-388. Huo Jin, He Jixiang, Gao Yang, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of shale oil development in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag[J]. XinJiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 379-388.