石油科技论坛

石油科技论坛 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 36-40.

• 科技管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

石油工程技术服务业对标评价研究

孙　键   

  1. 中国石化石油工程技术研究院
  • 出版日期:2015-09-01 发布日期:2015-09-01
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油化工股份有限公司科技攻关项目“海内外石油工程决策支持体系研究”部分研究内容

Research on Benchmarking of Petroleum Engineering Service

Sun Jian   

  1. Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 100101, China
  • Online:2015-09-01 Published:2015-09-01

PDF

摘要： 依据斯宾塞组织有机体、马斯洛需求层次模型，结合石油工程技术服务企业的特征，构建了石油工程竞 争力评价指标体系，涵盖包括结构、规模、循环、免疫、技能、遗传、决策、文化8 项二级指标及多项三级指标，选 取斯伦贝谢、贝克休斯、哈里伯顿、威德福、纳珀斯、塞班和中国石油集团石油工程板块、中国石化集团石油工程板块、 中海油服、海油工程这些最直接的竞争对手，逐个进行对标分析，较直观地找出公司优劣势，指出国内油服公司正全 面崛起，但在免疫、循环、遗传、规模上尚有较大差距，在文化、技能和决策上有一定优势，为决策者制定下一步战 略提供了全新视角。

关键词: 石油工程, 评价体系, 油服公司, 中国石化, 对标分析, 战略决策

Abstract: Based on Spencer organism theory and Maslow’s hierarchy needs model and combined with the characteristics of petroleum engineering technological service enterprises, an evaluation index system is established to appraise petroleum engineering competitiveness, covering eight secondary indexes, such as structure, scale, recycle, immunity, skill, genetics, decision-making and culture, as well as a number of tertiary indexes. Some direct competitors are selected for benchmarking analysis, such as Schlumberger, Baker Hughes, Halliburton, Weatherford, Nabors, and some Chinese companies from CNPC, Sinopec and CNOOC. The results show that the system can directly reflect a company’s advantages and disadvantages. It is indicated that the Chinese oilfield service companies are now under rapid development and have some advantages in culture, skill and decision-making but they need to make efforts in the areas of immunity, recycle, genetics and scale. The system provides a new perspective for decision makers to formulate their future strategy.

Key words: petroleum engineering, evaluation system, oilfield service company, Sinopec, benchmarking analysis, strategic decisions