引进技术评估方法研究与应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2020.01.008

石油科技论坛 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 43-48.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2020.01.008

引进技术评估方法研究与应用

赵明¹　焦姣²　刘知鑫²　张珈铭²　刘嘉²　孟祥雷³　范文君⁴

1.中国石油天然气集团公司科技管理部；2.中国石油集团经济技术研究院； 3.北京璟航环境技术有限公司；4.中国石油大学（北京）

出版日期:2020-04-14 发布日期:2020-04-14
基金资助:
中国石油天然气集团有限公司项目“公司发展战略与科技基础工作决策支持研究”下设课题“集团公司限制与禁止类引进技术目录专题研究”（编号：2018D-5005-19）。

Study and Application of Evaluation Methods for Technology Transfer

Zhao Ming¹, Jiao Jiao², Liu Zhixin², Zhang Jiaming², Liu Jia², Meng Xianglei³, Fan Wenjun⁴

1. CNPC Science and Technology Management Department, Beijing 100027, China; 2. CNPC Economics & Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100724, China; 3. Beijing Jinghang Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China; 4.China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Online:2020-04-14 Published:2020-04-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 技术是企业发展的核心驱动力，自主研发和外部引进是企业解决技术问题的主要途径。为落实国家促进科技成果转化法，实施企业引进技术目录制度，准确划定引进技术类别，科学制定引进技术目录，是一项十分重要的工作。基于企业内部引进技术目录管理的技术引进评估体系，是一套较为科学、定性与定量相结合的综合评估方法。技术评估从概念设计入手，结合国际9级技术成熟度分析方法，建立包括政策性、成熟性、重要性、先进性、经济性五大类分析指标的评估依据和方法，采用基础评估、二次评估流程，对现有目录技术后评估应用，技术评价准确，评估效果良好。该评估决策体系和五大类评估指标等具有普适性，可适用于其他技术的不同价值评估。

关键词: 技术目录, 技术引进, 评估方法, 技术评估指标, 技术成熟度

Abstract: Technology serves as the key engine for a company’s business development. Independent research and technology transfer are the main methods for a company to solve its technological problems. To implement the State law for accelerating transformation of technological achievements and carry out the technology transfer catalog system for companies, it is of vital importance to make accurate definition of the technology transfer categories and scientific formulation of the technology. The evaluation system of technology transfer based on management of the company’s internal technology transfer catalog is a series of scientific and integrated appraising methods, both qualitative and quantitative. Combined with an international TRL (Technology Readiness Level) 9 analysis method, the series of methods starts with conceptual design and defines the five analysis indicators relating to policy, maturity, importance, sophistication and economy. The basic evaluation - secondary evaluation process is adopted to make post-evaluation of the existing technology catalog. As a result, the technology evaluation is accurate with desirable results. This evaluating and decisionmaking system with the five categories of evaluating indicators can be used extensively and applied to evaluate other technologies for different values.

赵明　焦姣　刘知鑫　张珈铭　刘嘉　孟祥雷　范文君. 引进技术评估方法研究与应用[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2020, 39(1): 43-48.

Zhao Ming, Jiao Jiao, Liu Zhixin, Zhang Jiaming, Liu Jia, Meng Xianglei, Fan Wenjun. Study and Application of Evaluation Methods for Technology Transfer[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2020, 39(1): 43-48.

参考文献

[1] 熊曼辰. 基于概念设计的中国企业接受国际企业技术转移的控制研究[D]. 昆明：昆明理工大学, 2008. Xiong Manchen. Research on C h i n e s e e n t e r p r i s e s controlling the technological transfer by IC under concept design[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2008.
[2] 王铭宗. 国际企业技术创新中的技术风险研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学,2001. Wang Zongming. Research on risk of technology innovation in international enterprise[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University,2001.
[3]Mankins J C. Technology readiness levels[R]. NASA, 1995.
[4]Assistant Secretary of Defense for Rescarch and Engineering. Technology readiness assessment (TRA) guidance[R]. USA Department of Defense, 2011.
[5]US Department of Energy. Technology readiness assessment guide[R]. Washington DC: USA Department of Energy, 2011.
[6]European Commission. Horizon 2020 work programme 2014- 2015[R]. European Commission Decision C, 2014.
[7]International Organization for Standardization. Space systemsdefinition of the technology readiness levels (TRLs) and their criteria of assessment: ISO 16290:2013[S]. ISO, 2013.
[8] 总装备部电子信息基础部．GJB 7688—2012 装备技术成熟度等级划分及定义[S]. 2012. Electronic Information Foundation Department of General Equipment Department. Classification and definition of the technology readiness levels for materiel: GJB 7688— 2012[S].2012.
[9] 傅诚德, 牛立全, 范向红, 等. 公司重大科技专项管理的认识与建议[J]. 石油科技论坛，2018,37(6) ：1-5. Fu Chengde, Niu Liquan, Fan Xianghong, et al.Understanding and suggestions on management of company’s major science and technology projects[J]. Oil Forum,2018,37(6):1-5.
[10] 王雪松. 项目管理知识体系在石油企业科技项目管理中的应用研究[J]. 石油科技论坛,2018,37(1):10-13. Wang Xuesong. Application of project management knowledge system for technological project management of petroleum enterprises[J]. Oil Forum,2018,37(1):10-13.
[11] 吴燕生. 技术成熟度及其评价方法[M]. 北京：国防工业出版社,2012:1-200. Wu Y S. Technoloy Readiness and its Assessment Method[M]. Beijing: National Defens Industry Press, 2012:1-200.
[12]Xiong M C, Zou P. Industrial design management and culture based on conceptual design[R]. Advances in Grinding and Abrasive Processes: Selected Papers from the 12th Grinding and Machining Conference. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2005.
[13]Rafiq Y, Beck M. A decision support tool for multidisciplinary conceptual design[J]. Structural Engineer,2008, 86(1):37-42.

引进技术评估方法研究与应用

Study and Application of Evaluation Methods for Technology Transfer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张运东　袁磊　于营丽　吴潇　王冠群　雷凌. 促进中央企业科技成果转化的思考与建议[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2021, 40(4): 32-39.
[2]	马广军　吴雪鹏　江山红　周丽梅. 基于技术成熟度的科技项目管理体系探索与实践[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2021, 40(2): 29-34.
[3]	刘斌. 油气储量价值评估方法探讨[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2019, 38(6): 29-33.
[4]	辜　穗　任丽梅　杨雅雯. 油气科技绩效评估现状及发展对策[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2019, 38(3): 23-28.
[5]	闫　娜　王敏生　张大军. 世界石油工程技术研发管理动向及启示[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2018, 37(2): 56-63.
[6]	张全立　王宏伟　马汝涛　唐纯静. 完全项目制与管理工具在超前研究中的应用[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2017, 36(4): 9-14.
[7]	姚子修　金　旭　李建明　魏松波　雷丹妮. 颠覆性材料技术发展现状及其对传统能源的潜在影响[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2017, 36(3): 45-49.
[8]	曾力波康力平　王禹钦　杨法杰. 管道科技项目后评价方法优化与实践[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2016, 35(6): 25-29.
[9]	郭鹏, 冯文康. 国际油气合作项目经济效益评估方法[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2008, 27(6): 31-35.