石油科技论坛

石油科技论坛 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 64-69.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2021.01.010

• 科技管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

落实科技创新政策    激发科研人员创新活力

张志山1　赵世琴2　聂艳1　何萍1   

  1. 1.中石油克拉玛依石化有限责任公司；2.中国石油新疆油田公司工程技术研究院
  • 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-04-16
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区中小企业技术创新基金“三次采油微生物助剂及技术”（编号：CXJJ2003-11）； 中国石油天然气集团公司重大科技专项“克拉玛依超稠油加工成套技术开发与工业应用”（编号：2013E-1504）。

Adopt Technological Innovation Policies; Stimulate Enthusiasm of Scientific Researchers for Innovation

Zhang Zhishan1,TZhao Shiqin2,T Nie Yan1,THe Ping1   

  1. 1.PetroChina Karamay Petrochemical Co. Ltd., Karamay 834003, China; 2.Engineering and Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China
  • Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-04-16
  • Supported by:
     

PDF

摘要： 以中国石油地区公司所属研究院为着眼点，分析当前科技政策落实情况和存在的问题，从激发科研人员创造力的视角出发，在优化科研人员绩效评价、推进“双序列”改革、完善配套激励措施等方面取得了有益的工作经验和显著成效。在优化科研人员绩效评价方面，定性考核和量化考核相结合，从态度绩效、行为绩效与结果绩效3个维度进行评价，对科研人员的行为绩效与结果绩效进行量化，较为客观、公正，准确地反映了科研人员的工作业绩，激发了科研人员的积极性；在推进科研人员“双序列”改革方面，将科研人员量化考核结果应用于专业技术岗位设置和评聘中，促使改革顺利进行；在激励机制建立与优化方面，重点考虑激励的层次、覆盖面和强度等问题，并在科技成果转化创效、奖励创意和落实专利奖酬政策中得到落实。

 

关键词: 科技政策, 科研人员, 创新活力, 绩效评价, “双序列”改革

Abstract: This paper focuses on the research institutes affiliated to CNPC’s regional companies and analyzes the present conditions and existing issues concerning implementation of the technological policies. Thanks to the efforts for stimulation of scientific researchers’ creativity, the remarkable achievements with the beneficial work experiences have been made in optimizing evaluation of scientific researchers’ performance, promoting the “double-sequence” reform, and improving the series of incentive measures. As for optimizing evaluation of scientific researchers’ performance, qualitative appraisal and quantitative appraisal are combined on the basis of three dimensions -- attitude performance, behavior performance and result performance. Quantifying behavior performance and result performance of scientific researchers can reflect their work performance objectively, fairly and accurately, thus stimulating enthusiasm of scientific researchers. In the area of the “double-sequence” reform, the results from quantitative appraisal of researchers are used to set up and appraise professional and technological jobs, keeping the reform on the track. In the area of establishing and optimizing the incentive mechanism, the efforts are focused on the incentive levels, coverage and strength, which are connected to the policies concerning transformation of technological results into higher performance, reward of creativity, and remunerations for patents.

Key words: technological policies, scientific researchers, innovation vigor, evaluation of performance, the “double-sequence&rdquo, reform

中图分类号: